Mm

Article

When people hear the term Unified Theory

, sometimes called the theory of large associations, or even “Theory of Everything,” they think about it in terms of perhaps physics, where a theory or a theory that can determine how these nuclear forces, electromagnetic and gravitational, would reconcile seemingly incompatible aspects of various field theories to create a single comprehensive set of theoretical equations.Such could potentially unlock the secrets of nature and to very universe, or, as Kato Macho theorist, put it “an equation an inch long, which would allow us to read the thoughts of God.” That’s how important theories can be unified. However, no unified theory to deal with heady topics as physics or nature of the universe as self, but can be applied to several topics landings, in this case nutrition.Regardless on this subject in a unique theory as saturated above, trying to explain seemingly incompatible aspects of various theories. In this article I will try to combine seemingly incompatible or opposing views in terms of food, namely, that perhaps the longest discussion in food sciences: calories against. Macro nutrients.One school, I would say that “old school” in nutrition, says that weight loss or weight gain is all about calories, and “calories in calories,” regardless of source (eg, crabs, fat, protein or) They base their position on various lines of evidence, as in other schools. conclusion.The this, I call it “new school” of thought on the subject, it may take or lose weight, which is actually about where the calories, as in the case (eg, crabs, fat and protein), and weight loss or benefit dictates that meaning. they feel “calories calorie” mantra of the old school is wrong with her. too, so that last line differently CONCLUSION debate was between evidence.This people in nutrition, biology, physiology and many other disciplines, for decades. The result that led to conflicting advice and a lot of confusion from the general public, not to mention many medical professionals and other groups.Before I go further, two key points that need to understand any single theory: one good theory is simple, concise and understandable even for non-professionals, however, under or by this theory, a large amount of information that can often take several volumes of books One theory is. . some theorists offered many times before it can even be proven or fully supported by physical evidence over time, different lines of evidence, whether mathematical, physical, etc.., therefore maintenance, and theory. solidifies and improve this theory is correct, and further lines of evidence shows the theory needs revision, or is just wrong I feel that there is sufficient evidence now more than at this time to give a unified theory of nutrition and continuous lines of evidence will continue (with some possible revisions) to keep the theory as fact .. “Calories calories” old-school food, which includes most nutritionists calories calories is often effective when it comes to achieving weight loss or weight gain or weight loss is strictly a matter. “Calories in, calories from . “translations, where the” burn “more calories than you take, you will lose weight regardless of the source of calories and if you eat more calories than you burn every day, you will gain weight regardless of calorie source. This long and made of food proteins based on the fact that crabs and about 4 calories per gram and fat approximately 9 calories per gram, and the source of those calories do not count. They are based on the fact that a lot of research if it finds that reduces calories by X number each day, weight loss is the result if you add and I know that X number of calories than what used to weight . However every day, “calories in calories from the” mantra ignores current research suggests that fat, crabs, and proteins have very different effects on metabolism in many ways, such as their effects on hormones (eg , insulin, leptonnoho, glucagon, etc.), the impact on hunger and appetite, thermic effects (heat), the impact on the separation of proteins (UCPs), and also other effects mentioned.Even 1000 that could be worse, this school of thought ignores the fact that even within a macro nutrient, they can have different effects on metabolism. This school of thought ignores the ever mounting volume of studies with different diets showed that macro-nutrient relationships with the same calories differently affect body composition, cholesterol, oxidative stress, etc.Translated, not just the mantra “We calories calories” was wrong, “all fats are equal” or “white protein” is also incorrect, for example, we now know different fats (eg fish oil from saturated fat.) have completely different effects on metabolism and health in general, as we now know different carbohydrates., have their own effects (eg, compared with a high GI. Low GI), as we know different proteins can have unique effects.The “calories do not matter” school school of thought says thoughtthis usually eating more, some particular macro nutrient in their magic relations, calories do not matter. For example, followers ketohennoy style diet with high fat consumption, which are composed and very low carbohydrates (eg Atkins, etc). Often maintain calories do not matter if diet.Others To support such as eating high protein intake high, with very low fat and carbohydrate intakes, calories do not count the old school, this school does not take into account the effects of such diets in different ways and ignore the simple realities of human physiology,. does not mention the laws of thermodynamics! In fact, althoug it is clear different macro nutrients in different quantities and ratios have different effects on weight loss, fat burning, and other metabolic effects, calories count. Date and real world experience of millions of diet, it is clear on reality.The is true for diets is that they are often better at suppressing appetite and person simply ends so eating fewer calories and lose weight Additionally, weight loss diets from so often compared to water .. fat, at least the first few weeks, that does not. does not mean that people can not experience significant weight loss, with some of these diets, but the effect is due to reduced calories from. any magical effects often claimed by supporters diets.Weight against such loss. Fat loss! It was clear from research evidence and material resources in the world to lose weight, you must use more calories than we take in (via reducing calorie intake and increasing exercise or physical), but we know different diets have different effects on metabolism, appetite, body composition and other physiological variables … Brink food only theory … So, this fact led me to a unified theory of Brink food that says “Total calories determined how much weight gain or loss in persons macro nutrient relationship dictates that a person gains or losses” This seemingly simple statement allows people to understand the difference between the two schools of thought. For example, studies have often found two groups of people, put on household consumption of calories, but very different ratios crabs, fat, and protein losing different amounts of body fat and or muscle (eg muscle, bone , etc) .. Some studies have found, for example, people from a higher protein diet lost about crab, low weigh as much as another group a diet rich in proteins below a crab, but high protein diet group lost more fat and less actual lean body mass (muscle) or, in some studies using the same. but different macro nutrient intakes of calorie consumption often find high-protein diet may lose less weight than real following a high protein diet crab, but the actual loss of fat content is higher in high crab protein poor diet. This effect is also observed in some studies that compared high fat / low fat crab crab Compared with High / Low Usually the effect is enhanced if exercise involved that might expect.Of normally these effects are not universally found in all studies devoted to the study of this problem, but most of the data is clear: .. diets containing different macro nutrient relations have different effects on the physiology of calories for human consumption are identical even when (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11) or, as the authors of a recent study concluded that question. “Diets with identical energy contents can provide a different effect on plasma leptons, energy expenditure, voluntary food intake and nitrogen balance, suggesting that physiological adaptation to energy restriction could be changing their diet.” (12) Objectives time There are many studies showing that the current ratio of crabs, fat and protein in the diet may affect as actually lost (eg, fat, muscle, bone and water) and calories has the greatest effect of this as much total weight is lost. You begin to see how my unified theory of nutrition combines the “calorie calorie” school “calories do not matter” school to help people make decisions about nutrition? Knowing this, to make it easier for people to understand and perhaps contradictory diet nutrition advice out there (of course, this ignores completely unscientific and dangerous people, nutrition counseling are because of bad books, TV, friends, clean, good value, but that is another article as a whole). Knowing the above information and keeping Unified Theory of Nutrition mind leads us to some important conclusions and potentially useful: optimal diet designed to make a person lose fat and retain as much LBM opportunities is not the same as a diet simply designed to weight.A nutrition program designed to burn fat is not created only lose Reducing calorie version of nutrition designed to weight gain, and they must be designed with the loss of Deputy versa.Diets fat, not only as a weight loss goal, but can not be diet ignored.This calories because I’m designing for people, or write. about obtaining or losing weight and not just more or less calorie diet review short version:. I design diet plans start with calories and nutrients build LBM report the number of calories necessary macro However, diets designed for fat burning (in comparison with weight loss), start with the correct macro nutrient relations depends on variables such as number of LBM against those responsible.! percentage of body fat, activity level and so on. and figure out calories based on macro nutrient relations to achieve their fat loss with a minimum loss of LBM. real macro nutrient ratio may be quite different for both diets and even individuals.Diets the treatment of all people the same macro nutrients (eg, 40/30/30 or 70, 30, 10, etc). Regardless of calories, goals, activity levels, and so on will be. always less than optimal. optimum ratio of macro nutrients can vary in calories and variables.Perhaps other most important, one theory explains why focus on weight loss to fat loss. For most people, including most medical professionals and the media, always suffer long-term failure to achieve results want.Finally people, universal theory makes clear that the best diet for fat loss, muscle or conquest , and for this purpose should take into account not only calories, but macro nutrient relationships that optimize metabolic effects and answer the question: what impact will this diet on appetite What impact will this diet on the rate of metabolism that will impact this diet on my table muscle (LBM)? What impact will this diet on hormones, the hormone that can improve or impede my goals What impact will this have on a diet (complete space)? best diet for your future From where looking to gain weight or lose it, you must ask the right questions to get the right questions will answers.Asking significant also help you avoid the pitfalls of unscientific poorly thought diet can not keep that promise and goes against what we know about human physiology and the laws of physics here is very brief if you follow a diet or weight loss or not to get tackled, and some questions! You can count on millions of people disappointed that they did not get the best results have hoped and made another nutrition “guru” laugh all the way to the bank in your diet expense.Any claims calories do not matter, forget about it. Any diet that tells you what is the magic ratio of foods, ignore it Any diet that tells you any food source is evil. this is a scam <= empty. "_new" Rel = "nofollow"